How To Score The Clock Drawing Test
Purpose
The CDT is used to quickly assess visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may make up one's mind the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions (Adunsky, Fleissig, Levenkrohn, Arad, & Nov, 2002; Suhr, Grace, Allen, Nadler, & McKenna, 1998; McDowell, & Newell, 1996).
The CDT may be used in addition to other quick screening
tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
In-Depth Review
Purpose of the measure
The CDT is used to quickly appraise visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may determine the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions (Adunsky, Fleissig, Levenkrohn, Arad, & November, 2002; Suhr, Grace, Allen, Nadler, & McKenna, 1998; McDowell & Newell, 1996).
The CDT may be used in addition to other quick screening
tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
Bachelor versions
The CDT is a uncomplicated task completion exam in its most bones grade. There are several variations to the CDT:
Verbal control:
- Gratis drawn clock:
The individual is given a blank sheet of paper and asked first to depict the confront of a clock, place the numbers on the clock, and so draw the hands to signal a given time. To successfully complete this chore, the patient must start describe the contour of the clock, and so identify the numbers 1 through 12 within, and finally indicate the correct time past cartoon in the easily of the clock. - Pre-drawn clock:
Alternatively, some clinicians prefer to provide the individual with a pre-drawn circumvolve and the patient is only required to place the numbers and the hands on the face of the clock. They argue that the patient'south ability to make full in the numbers may be adversely affected if the contour is poorly fatigued. In this task, if an private draws a completely normal clock, it is a fast indication that a number of functions are intact. However, a markedly abnormal clock is an important indication that the individual may have a cognitive deficit, warranting further investigation.
Regardless of which blazon is used (gratuitous drawn or pre-drawn), the exact command CDT tin simultaneously appraise a patient's language function (verbal comprehension); memory function (call up of a visual engram, short-term storage, and recall of fourth dimension setting instructions); and executive office. The verbal control variation of the CDT is highly sensitive for temporal lobe dysfunction (due to its heavy involvement in both memory and language processes) and frontal lobe dysfunction (due to its arbitration of executive planning
) (Shah, 2002).
Copy control:
The individual is given a fully drawn clock with a certain time pre-marked and is asked to replicate the cartoon as closely as possible. The successful completion of the copy command requires less use of language and retention functions but requires greater reliance on visuospatial and perceptual processes.
Clock reading test:
A modified version of the copy command CDT only asks the patient to read aloud the indicated time on a clock fatigued by the examiner. The copy control clock-drawing and clock reading tests are good for assessing parietal lobe lesions such every bit those that may result in hemineglect. It is important to do both the verbal command and the re-create command tests for every patient equally a patient with a temporal lobe lesion may re-create a pre-drawn clock adequately, whereas their clock drawn to verbal command may testify poor number spacing and incorrect time setting. Conversely, a patient with a parietal lobe lesion may draw an acceptable clock to verbal command, while their clock drawing with the copy command may testify obvious signs of neglect.
Time-Setting Instructions:
The nearly common setting chosen past clinicians is "3 O'clock" (Freedman, Leach, Kaplan, Winocur, Shulman, & Delis, 1994). Although this setting adequately assesses comprehension and motor execution, it does non indicate the presence of whatsoever left neglect the patient may have because it does not require the left one-half of the clock to be used at all. The fourth dimension setting "ten subsequently 11" is an ideal setting (Kaplan, 1988). It forces the patient to nourish to the whole clock and requires the recoding of the control "x" to the number "ii" on the clock. It too has the added advantage of uncovering whatever stimulus-bound errors that the patient may make. For example, the presence of the number "ten" on the clock may trap some patients and prevent the recoding of the command "10" into the number "2." Instead of drawing the minute hand towards the number "ii" on the clock to betoken "10 after," patients prone to stimulus-jump errors will fixate and draw the minute mitt toward the number "ten" on the clock.
Features of the mensurate
Scoring:
There are a number of dissimilar ways to score the CDT. In full general, the scores are used to evaluate any errors or distortions such as neglecting to include numbers, putting numbers in the wrong place, or having incorrect spacing (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Scoring systems may exist elementary or complex, quantitative or qualitative in nature. As a quick preliminary screening
tool to simply detect the presence or absenteeism of cognitive impairment, you may wish to apply a simple quantitative method (Lorentz et al., 2002). All the same, if a more complex assessment is required, a qualitative scoring system would exist more than telling.
Dissimilar scoring methods have been found to be better suited for dissimilar subject groups (Richardson & Glass, 2002; Heinrik, Solomesh, & Berkman, 2004). In patients with stroke
A psychometric study in patients with stroke
Subscales:
None typically reported.
Equipment:
Simply a paper and pencil is required. Depending on the method chosen, y'all may need to fix a circumvolve (well-nigh x cm in diameter) on the paper for the patient.
Training:
The CDT can be administered by individuals with little or no grooming in cognitive assessment. Scanlan, Castor, Quijano, & Borson (2002) found that a simple binary rating of clock drawings (normal or abnormal) by untrained raters was surprisingly constructive in classifying subjects as having dementia or not. In this study, a common error of untrained scorers was failure to recognize incorrect spacing of numbers on the clock confront as abnormal. By directing at this type of fault, concordance between untrained and adept raters should better.
Time:
All variations of the CDT should take approximately one-two minutes to complete (Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003).
Alternative forms of the CDT
The Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Arroyo (CDT-MIA) is a iv-pace, 20-item instrument, with a maximum score of 33. The CDT-MIA emphasizes differential scoring of contour, numbers, easily, and center. It integrates 3 existing CDT'southward:
- Freedman et al'due south free-fatigued clock (1994) on some item definitions
- Scoring techniques adapted from Paganini-Hill, Clark, Henderson, & Birge (2001)
- Some items borrowed from Royall, Cordes, & Polk (1998) executive CLOX
The CDT-MIA was institute to exist reliable and valid in individuals with dementia, however this measure has not been validated in the stroke
Client suitability
Can be used as a screening musical instrument with:
Nearly whatsoever patient population (Wagner, Nayak, & Fink, 1995). The test appears to exist differentially sensitive to some types of disease processes. Particularly, information technology has proven to exist clinically useful in differentiating amidst normal elderly, patients with neurodegenerative or vascular diseases, and those with psychiatric disorders, such every bit depression
and schizophrenia (Dastoor, Schwartz, & Kurzman, 1991; Heinik, Vainer-Benaiah, Lahav, & Drummer, 1997; Lee & Lawlor, 1995; Shulman, Gold, & Cohen, 1993; Spreen & Strauss, 1991; Tracy, De Leon, Doonan, Musciente, Ballas, & Josiassen, 1996; Wagner et al., 1995; Wolf-Klein, Silverstone, Levy, & Brod, 1989).
Can be used with:
- Patients with stroke
Also called a "brain set on" and happens when brain cells die because of inadequate claret menses. 20% of cases are a hemorrhage in the brain acquired by a rupture or leakage from a blood vessel. 80% of cases are besides know as a "schemic stroke", or the formation of a claret jell in a vessel supplying blood to the brain. More than . Because the CDT requires a nonverbal response, it may be administered to those with speech difficulties but who have sufficient comprehension to understand the requirement of the task.
Should not be used in:
- Patients who cannot understand spoken or written instructions
- Patients who cannot write
As with many other neuropsychological screening
measures, the CDT is afflicted by age, education, weather condition such as visual neglect and hemiparesis, and other factors such as the presence of depression
(Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003; Lorentz, Scanlan, & Borson, 2002). The degree to which these factors bear upon ones score depends much on the scoring method applied (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Moreover, the CDT focuses on right hemisphere function, so it is of import to use this test in conjunction with other neuropsychological tests (McDowell & Newell, 1996).
In what languages is the mensurate available?
The CDT can be conducted in whatever linguistic communication. Borson et al. (1999) constitute that language spoken did not have any direct effect on CDT exam performance.
Summary
What does the tool measure out? | Visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may decide the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions. |
What types of clients can the tool be used for? | Most any patient population. It has proven to be clinically useful in differentiating among normal elderly, patients with neurodegenerative or vascular diseases, and those with psychiatric disorders, such as depression and schizophrenia. |
Is this a screening or assessment tool? | Screening |
Time to administrate | All variations of the CDT should take approximately 1-ii minutes to consummate. |
Versions |
|
Languages | The CDT can be conducted in whatever linguistic communication. |
Measurement Properties | |
Reliability | Test-retest: Out of four studies examining test-retest reliability , three reported excellent examination-retest and i found adequate examination-retest. Inter-rater: Out of 7 studies examining inter-rater reliability , half-dozen reported excellent inter-rater and one reported acceptable (for examiner clocks) to excellent (for free-drawn and pre-drawn clocks inter-rater. |
Validity | Criterion: Predicted lower functional power and increased need for supervision on hospital discharge; poor physical ability and longer length of stay in geriatric rehabilitation; activities of daily living at maximal recovery. Construct: The CDT correlated adequately with the Mini-Mental Land Test and the Functional Independence Measure out. Known groups: Meaning differences between Alzheimer'south patients and controls detected by CDT. |
Does the tool detect change in patients? | Not applicable |
Acceptability | The CDT is short and simple. It is a nonverbal task and may be less threatening to patients than responding to a series of questions. |
Feasibility | The CDT is inexpensive and highly portable. It can be administered in situations in which longer tests would be impossible or inconvenient. Even the most complex administration and scoring system requires approximately two minutes. It tin can exist administered by individuals with minimal training in cognitive assessment. |
How to obtain the tool? | A pre-fatigued circle tin be downloaded by clicking on this link: pre-drawn circle |
Psychometric Properties
Overview
Until recently, data on the psychometric properties of the CDT were limited. While in that location are many possible ways to administrate and score the CDT, the psychometric backdrop of all the various systems seem consistent and all forms correlate strongly with other cognitive measures (Scanlan et al., 2002; Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003; McDowell & Newell, 1996). Further, scoring of the CDT has been found to be both accurate and consistent in patients with stroke
For the purposes of this review, we conducted a literature search to place all relevant publications on the psychometric backdrop of the more commonly applied scoring methods of the CDT. We then selected to review articles from high affect journals, and from a variety of authors.
Reliability
Exam-retest:
Using Spearman rank order correlations of the CDT has been reported by several investigators using a variety of scoring systems:
- Manos and Wu (1994) reported an "excellent" 2-day examination-retest reliability
A mode of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the same scale on two unlike occasions and and then the two scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is appropriate merely if the phenomenon that the scale measures is known to be stable over the interval between assessments. If the miracle beingness measured fluctuates substantially over time, so the exam-retest paradigm may significantly underestimate reliability. In using test-retest reliability, the investigator needs to accept into business relationship the possibility of practice furnishings, which tin artificially inflate the approximate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
of 0.87 for medical patients and 0.94 for surgical patients. - Tuokko et al. (1992) reported an "adequate" examination-retest reliability
A way of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the same scale on ii different occasions and then the ii scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is advisable merely if the phenomenon that the calibration measures is known to be stable over the interval between assessments. If the miracle being measured fluctuates substantially over fourth dimension, then the test-retest image may significantly underestimate reliability. In using test-retest reliability, the investigator needs to accept into business relationship the possibility of practice effects, which can artificially inflate the estimate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
of 0.70 at 4 days. - Mendez et al. (1992) reported and "fantabulous" coefficients of 0.78 and 0.76 at 3 and 6 months, respectively.
- Freedman et al. (1994) reported test-retest reliability
A manner of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the same scale on ii unlike occasions and so the two scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is advisable but if the miracle that the calibration measures is known to be stable over the interval between assessments. If the phenomenon being measured fluctuates substantially over time, then the examination-retest paradigm may significantly underestimate reliability. In using exam-retest reliability, the investigator needs to have into account the possibility of practice effects, which tin artificially inflate the estimate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
as "very depression". However, when the "10 later on 11" time setting was used with the examiner clock, which is known to be a more sensitive setting for detecting cognitive dysfunction, test-retest reliabilityA way of estimating the reliability of a scale in which individuals are administered the aforementioned scale on 2 different occasions and so the two scores are assessed for consistency. This method of evaluating reliability is appropriate only if the phenomenon that the scale measures is known to exist stable over the interval between assessments. If the phenomenon being measured fluctuates essentially over fourth dimension, then the exam-retest paradigm may significantly underestimate reliability. In using test-retest reliability, the investigator needs to take into account the possibility of practice effects, which tin artificially inflate the estimate of reliability (National Multiple Sclerosis Society).
was institute to be "splendid" (0.94).
Inter-rater:
Inter-rater reliability
of the CDT, equally indicated by Spearman rank order correlations (not the preferred method of analyses for assessing inter-rater reliability
but one used in earlier measurement research), has likewise been reported by several investigators:
- Sunderland et al. (1989) institute "splendid" coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.97 and found no difference between clinician and non-clinician raters (0.84 and 0.86, respectively).
- Rouleau et al. (1992) institute "excellent" inter-rater reliability
A method of measuring reliability . Inter-rater reliability determines the extent to which ii or more than raters obtain the aforementioned result when using the same musical instrument to measure a concept.
, with coefficients ranging from 0.92 to 0.97. - Mendez et al. (1992) reported "fantabulous" inter-rater reliability
A method of measuring reliability . Inter-rater reliability determines the extent to which two or more raters obtain the same result when using the same instrument to measure a concept.
of 0.94. - Tuokko et al. (1992) reported high coefficients ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 across 3 annual assessments.
- The modified Shulman calibration (Shulman, Aureate, Cohen, & Zucchero, 1993) also has "excellent" inter-rater reliability
A method of measuring reliability . Inter-rater reliability determines the extent to which two or more raters obtain the same result when using the same instrument to measure a concept.
(0.94 at baseline, 0.97 at 6 months, and 0.97 at 12 months). - Manos and Wu (1994) obtained "first-class" inter-rater reliability
A method of measuring reliability . Inter-rater reliability determines the extent to which ii or more raters obtain the same result when using the same musical instrument to measure a concept.
coefficients ranging from 0.88 to 0.96. - Freedman et al. (1994) reported coefficients ranging from 0.79 to 0.99 on the free-drawn clocks, 0.84 to 0.85 using the pre-drawn contours, and 0.63 to 0.74 for the examiner clocks, demonstrating "excellent" inter-rater reliability
A method of measuring reliability . Inter-rater reliability determines the extent to which two or more raters obtain the aforementioned event when using the same instrument to measure a concept.
.
Southward et al. (2001) compared the psychometrics of three unlike scoring methods of the CDT (Libon revised arrangement; Rouleau rating scale; and Freedman scoring system) in a sample of 20 patients with stroke
were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
. Raters used like scoring criteria throughout, demonstrating "fantabulous" intra-rater reliability
. South et al. (2001) concluded that while the Libon scoring organisation demonstrated a range of reliabilities beyond different domains, the Rouleau and Freedman systems were in the fantabulous range.
Validity
In a review, Shulman (2000) reported that virtually studies achieved sensitivities and specificities of approximately 85% and concluded that the CDT, in conjunction with other widely used tests such as the Mini-Mental Country Test (MMSE), could provide a significant advance in the early detection of dementia. In contrast, Powlishta et al. (2002) concluded from their written report that the CDT did non appear to be a useful screening
tool for detecting very balmy dementia. Other authors take concluded that the CDT should not exist used solitary as a dementia screening
exam because of its overall inadequate performance (Borson & Brush, 2002; Storey et al., 2001). All the same, nigh of the previous studies were based on relatively minor sample sizes or were undertaken in a clinical setting, and their results may non be applicable to a larger community population.
Nishiwaki et al. (2004) studied the validity
of the CDT in comparison to the MMSE in a large general elderly population (aged 75 years or older). The specificity
of the CDT for detecting moderate-to-astringent cognitive impairment (MMSE score = 17) were 77% and 87%, respectively, for nurse
administration and 40% and 91%, respectively, for postal administration. The authors conclude that the CDT may have value as a brief face-to-face screening
tool for moderate/severe cerebral impairment in an older community population only is relatively poor at detecting milder cerebral impairment.
Few studies have examined the validity
of the CDT specifically in patients with stroke
coefficients (Pearson correlation
) betwixt the three cerebral tests resulted in r-values ranging from 0.51 to 0.59. Adunsky et al. (2002) ended that they share a reasonable caste of resemblance to each other, accounting for "adequate" concurrent validity
of these tests.
Bailey, Riddoch, and Crome (2000) evaluated a test bombardment for hemineglect in elderly patients with stroke
in the cess of representational neglect. Further, consistent with previous findings (Ishiai et al., 1993; Kaplan et al., 1991), the utility of the CDT as a screening
mensurate for neglect was not supported from these results. Reasons include the subjectivity in scoring, and questionable validity
in that the chore may also reverberate cognitive damage (Freidman, 1991), constructional apraxia, or impaired planning
ability (Kinsella, Packer, Ng, Olver, & Stark, 1995).
Responsiveness
Not applicable.
References
- Adunsky, A., Fleissig, Y., Levenkrohn, South., Arad, M., Nov, S.(2002). Clock drawing task, mini-mental land examination and cerebral-functional independence measure out: relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 35(2), 153-lx.
- Bailey, Thou. J., Riddoch, J., Crome, P. (2002). Evaluation ofa test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for utilise by therapists in clinical practice. Neurorehabilitation, 14(iii), 139-150.
- Borson, Southward., Brush, M., Gil, East., Scanlan, J., Vitaliano, P.,Chen, J., Cahsman, J., Sta Maria, M. M., Barnhart, R., Roques, J. (1999). The Clock Drawing Examination: Utility for dementia detection in multiethnic elders. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 54, M534-forty.
- Dastoor, D. P., Schwartz, G., Kurzman, D. (1991).Clock-drawing: An assessment technique in dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Gerontology, thirteen, 69-85.
- Freedman, M., Leach, L., Kaplan, Due east., Winocur, G., Shulman,K. I., Delis, D. C. (1994). Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Assay (pp. 5). New York: Oxford Academy Press.
- Friedman, P. J. (1991). Clock drawing in astute stroke.Age and Ageing, 20(2), 140-145.
- Heinik, J., Vainer-Benaiah, Z., Lahav, D., Drummer, D.(1997). Clock drawing test in elderly schizophrenia patients. International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 653-655.
- Heinik, J., Solomesh, I., Berkman, P. (2004). Correlationbetween the CAMCOG, the MMSE and three clock drawing tests in a specialized outpatient psychogeriatric service. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 38, 77-84.
- Heinik, J., Solomesh, I., Lin, R., Raikher, B., Goldray, D.,Merdler, C., Kemelman, P. (2004). Clock drawing examination-modified and integrated arroyo (CDT-MIA): Description and preliminary examination of its validity and reliability in dementia patients referred to a specialized psychogeriatric setting. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 17, 73-lxxx.
- Ishiai, S., Sugishita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gono, S., Watabiki,S. (1993). Clock cartoon test and unilateral spatial fail. Neurology, 43, 106-110.
- Kaplan, Due east. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychologicalassessment. In: T Bull & BK Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and exercise (pp. 129-167). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
- Kaplan, R.F., Verfaillie, G., Meadows, M., Caplan, L.R.,Pessin, Yard. S., DeWitt L. (1991). Changing attentional demands in left hemispatial neglect. Archives of Neurology, 48, 1263-1267.
- Kinsella, M., Packer, Southward., Ng, K., Olver, J., Stark, R.(1995). Standing problems in the assessment of neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 239-258.
- Lee, H., Lawlor, B. A. (1995). State-dependent nature of theClock Drawing Task in geriatric depression. Journal of the American Geriatrics Guild, 43, 796-798.
- Lorentz, W. J., Scanlan, J. M., Borson, S. (2002). Briefscreening tests for dementia. Can J Psychiatry, 47, 723-733.
- Manos, P. J., Wu, R. (1994). The Ten Betoken Clock Exam: Aquick screen and grading system for cognitive impairment in medical and surgical patients. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 24, 229-244.
- McDowell, I., Newell, C. (1996). Measuring Health. A Guideto Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2d ed. NewYork: Oxford University Printing.
- Mendez, K. F., Ala, T., Underwood, Grand. L. (1992). Developmentof scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimers affliction. Periodical of the American Elderliness Lodge, 40, 1095-1099.
- Nishiwaki, Y., Breeze, E., Smeeth, L., Bulpitt, C. J.,Peters, R., Fletcher, A. Eastward. (2004). Validity of the Clock-Drawing Examination as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(8), 797-807.
- Paganini-Hill, A., Clark, L. J., Henderson, V. W., Birge, Southward.J. (2001). Clock drawing: Analysis in a retirement community. J Am Geriatr Soc, 49, 941-947.
- Powlishta, K. Yard., von Dras, D. D., Stanford, A., Carr D. B.,Tsering, C., Miller, J. P., Morris, J. C. (2002). The Clock Cartoon Test is a poor screen for very mild dementia. Neurology, 59, 898-903.
- Richardson, H. Due east., Glass, J.N. (2002). A comparison ofscoring protocols on the clock cartoon test in relation to ease of employ, diagnostic grouping and correlations with mini-mental state examination. Journal of the American Elderliness Society, l, 169-173.
- Rouleau, I., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., Kennedy, C.,McGuire, K. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimers and Huntington'southward. Encephalon and Cognition, eighteen, 70-87.
- Royall, D. R., Cordes, J. A., Polk, Grand. (1998). CLOX: anexecutive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 64, 588-594.
- Ruchinskas, R. A., Curyto, G. J. (2003). Cognitive screeningin geriatric rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 48, 14-22.
- Scanlan, J. M., Brush, M., Quijano, C., Borson, South. (2002).Comparing clock tests for dementia screening: naïve judgments vs formal systems – what is optimal? International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(1), xiv-21.
- Shah, J. (2001). Only time will tell: Clock drawing as anearly indicator of neurological dysfunction. P&South Medical Review, 7(2), 30-34.
- Shulman, K. I., Gold, D. P., Cohen, C. A., Zucchero, C. A.(1993). Clock-drawing and dementia in the community: A longitudinal report. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, viii(half dozen), 487-496.
- Shulman, K. I. (2000). Clock-cartoon: Is it the idealcognitive screening test? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 548-561.
- Shulman, K., Shedletsky, R., Argent, I. (1986). Thechallenge of time: Clock-drawing and cerebral part in the elderly. International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1, 135-140.
- South, One thousand. B., Greve, K. Westward., Bianchini, K. J., Adams, D.(2001). Inter-rater reliability of Iii Clock Drawing Test scoring systems. Applied Neuropsychology, 8(3), 174-179.
- Spreen, O., Strauss, E. A. (1991). Compendium ofneuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Storey, J. E., Rowland, J. T., Basic, D., Conforti, D. A.(2001). A comparison of 5 clock scoring methods using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr, 16, 394-nine.
- Sunderland, T., Hill, J. L., Mellow, A. M., Lowlor, B. A.,Grundersheimer, J., Newhouse, P. A., Grafman, J. H. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer's illness: a novel measure of dementia severity. J Am Geriatr Soc, 37(viii), 725-729.
- Suhr, J., Grace, J., Allen, J., Nadler, J., McKenna, M.(1998). Quantitative and Qualitative Performance of Stroke Versus Normal Elderly on 6 Clock Drawing Systems. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, thirteen(6), 495-502.
- Tracy, J. I., De Leon, J., Doonan, R., Musciente, J.,Ballas, T., Josiassen, R. C. (1996). Clock drawing in schizophrenia. Psychological Reports, 79, 923-928.
- Tuokko, H., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Miller, J. A., Beattie,B. 50. (1992). The Clock Exam, a sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Social club, twoscore, 579-584.
- Wagner, M. T., Nayak, Thousand., Fink, C. (1995). Bedside screeningof neurocognitive role. In: L. A. Cushman & One thousand. J. Scherer (Eds.), Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation: Measurement and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 145-198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Watson, Y. I., Arfken, C. L., Birge, Due south. J. (1993). Clockcompletion : An objective screening test for dimentia. J Am Geriar Soc, 41(xi), 1235-xl.
- Wolf-Klein, Yard. P., Silverstone, F. A., Levy, A. P., Brod, Yard.S. (1989). Screening for Alzheimer'due south disease past clock cartoon.Journal of the American Elderliness Social club, 37, 730-734.
See the measure
Click hither to find a pre-drawn circle that tin can be used when administering the CDT.
Source: https://strokengine.ca/en/assessments/clock-drawing-test-cdt/
Posted by: hovisherivink44.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How To Score The Clock Drawing Test"
Post a Comment